8. Trying not to hit the ball too hard

 

Date: May 29th 2011
Format: Medal (Club Championship Qualifier)
Venue: [Home course]
Score: 93
Handicap mark: 3.7
Themes in reply:  Subconscious; old wives’ tales; clarity of purpose

 

Hi Colin,

Championship qualifier on Sat 28th May. Just to remind you that this is a medal competition played off the blue boxes and the best 8 scores go through to the quarter finals.

The weather was very poor, very windy and raining. We teed of at 8:45am, the rain was supposed to clear by 10am but it was more like 12.

I went to the practice ground before hand and hit about 20 shots into the wind. I practiced on Friday evening as well and I was trying not to hit the ball too hard as this imparts spin. I found that hitting it a bit softer kept it much straighter with only a small loss of distance. So this was my plan for the round.

I won’t go through all the shots I played in the round but here are the main points.

On the 1st hole the wind was strongly across / into (from the left). I took a driver and hit a poor shot which the wind took a long way right. I then hit a provisional ball with my 3 wood which was a better strike and the ball finished slightly right of the fairway. I didn’t find my first ball and ended up with a 7. I should have hit a 3 wood to begin with.

Dear John,

Club Championship Qualifier – Saturday 28th May

There is quite a lot to cover here, so please be patient.

1. The objective was to qualify and you didn’t. I want you to consider the following two statements and see if you can tell the difference between them:

  • “I played in the Club Championship on Saturday and I failed to qualify”.  
  • “To qualify for the matchplay stage of the Club Championship, I had to post one of the best 8 scores on the day. The eighth best score was 87; I scored 93.”

2. You had the worst of the conditions – a major “luck” factor in strokeplay golf and yet another reason why I don’t care for the format.

3. “Hitting the ball too hard imparts spin” is a classic piece of old bollocks. It is one of those bits of knowledge that golfers like to think is part of their craft, their trade. Painters and decorators will tell you that mixing in a dab of black gloss into a tin of white gloss makes the white shine whiter. Really! Wow! Even if it does, who the hell can tell, and who the hell cares. The way to distinguish this type of rubbish is to try telling it to somebody without winking at the end of the statement. Know what I mean, Guv?

 

To demolish this mischievous dollop of bullshit, I will simply ask you to consider for a moment or two what exactly (and I mean, exactly) is meant by “too hard”. I rest my case, M’lud.

We need to go back a few millennia to the Serengeti where a John ancestor is out looking for his lunch. John Ugug’s subconscious is only too aware of the many dangers that lurk in the long grasses of the Serengeti, and has learnt by the mysterious process of natural selection that the best chance of survival is to have all the senses on alert.

So, before Ugug sees the lion, he can hear something approaching, he can maybe smell something familiar and he can feel something unwanted crawling up his leg. Only when the danger is imminent will his subconscious allow one of his senses’ information streams (usually the visual) to dominate the others and, only then, because by switching off the other information streams it can process the relevant information as quickly as possible and so have the best chance of warding off the attack.

As the lion attacks, the thing is still crawling up his leg but he can’t feel it anymore and neither is he aware of the sweet scent of mimosas wafting across that part of the plain. His reaction to the pouncing lion is accurate because it has the full attention of the very powerful subconscious. The creepy crawly will have to be dealt with later.

John Ugug survives and, via his genes, passes on his uncanny spear throwing ability to his descendants. By the time you arrive in the world, conditions are such that your subconscious is rarely required to operate on high alert, but the ability to do so is still there because in evolutionary terms it wasn’t that long ago that your ancestor was fighting off starving lions.

So, in order to play golf brilliantly, how do we best exploit the incredible ability the subconscious has to produce astonishingly complicated sequences of muscular movements that result in incredibly accurate forces being applied to objects? Well, there’s a problem: a golf ball carries no inherent visual threat like a tiger does and so the subconscious does not get automatically activated by the sight of the ball.

So, in order to exploit the powers of the subconscious, the subconscious has to be consciously switched on with a golfing version of a slavering sabre-toothed tiger obviously looking for its breakfast, ie extremely precise and highly visual instructions in the form of a visualised golf shot.

But even though using the conscious mind to switch on the subconscious works, it does bring with it another problem: involving the conscious in part of the task of hitting a golf ball accurately runs the risk of allowing the conscious to take over the whole task; and once the club has started moving, any interference by the conscious brain will result in a reduction in “timing”. Unfortunately for the golfer, the conscious brain is highly motivated to take over the task of hitting golf balls, and resisting the temptation to consciously hit the ball is the golfer’s greatest challenge.

“I don’t want to hit the ball too hard today because it will impart too much spin which is not good in windy conditions” is a conscious thought that will only ever have the effect of clouding the vision of the golf shot the subconscious needs, and will therefore result in a reduction in “timing” and all that that means. Telling yourself that it is “the plan for the round” just serves to give your conscious even more permission to interfere in the work of the subconscious.

Take yourself back to that first shot off the first tee, and choose the shot you would play bearing in mind these facts:

  • At all times, control of the golf ball is the number one objective. 
  • The wind is blowing across the fairway left to right
  • There is rough and gorse along the right
  • Currently, even your best shots with your driver can fade slightly at the end of the shot
  • The hole is not playing longer because of the wind
  • You are very, very good with long irons
  • With irons, you can shape shots
  • You are nervous because you think you have a good chance of winning …
  • … and so you want a reasonable first hole to settle your nerves
  • You want to give yourself time to get a feel for the conditions

I think you would choose to hit a low-ish draw towards the bunker on the right. Once you had “seen” the shot, you would have chosen the club to execute the shot. Once you had done that, you would have started the process of bringing that shot to full, burning visualisation. If you had been committed to this process (if your “plan” wasn’t clouding the issue), then the image of the shot would have been even brighter than usual because it would have fed off the nervous energy produced by your ambition to win the tournament. The image of that first shot being even brighter than usual would have meant that there was a greater chance that the outcome would have been the exact one desired.

From this florid description it is easy to see why thoughts like “I must try to hit it “soft”” are so insidiously distracting to the subconscious, and thereby so destructive, Had that first shot been a corker then you may have had a quite different experience that morning.

As it is, it is history. Our only duty is to face it responsibly, learn and keep smiling!

 

I played the 2nd hole much better but 3 putted from just off the green for a 6. The 2nd was unreachable in 2 even though it was a par 4. I hit driver, 3 iron and 9 iron to get there. To put this is perspective, there was only 1 par there and 6 bogeys all day. The other 57 were double bogeys or worse!!

On the 3rd I didn’t hit a good drive but my partner saw it bounce in the rough on the right. When we got there we couldn’t find the ball (there were others near the spot and I wonder if someone picked it up). So I had to go back to the tee and play another ball. I made par with that one giving me a 6 in total. So my start was 766 against 444.

I played a bit better after that and went par, bogey, par, bogey, par, bogey which in those conditions was pretty acceptable.

After that I played the next few hole ok but needed to sink a couple of 10 footers to keep it going. So bogey on the 10th, followed by par, bogey.

On the 13th it p****d down and I had another 10 footer for a par but missed. It was all a bit of a scramble though.

To finish I went double bogey (db) on the 14th (went in the bunker again), db, db, par and finished nicely with a db after being just short of the 18th in 2.

Why did I play so badly?

Firstly the conditions in the morning were much worse than the afternoon when most qualified. Last year’s champion played in the morning and had a 90 and didn’t make it. IJ off scratch played with him and also had a 90.

Secondly, I probably put too much pressure on myself particularly after poor start. I know my age is against me ever winning this and as each year goes passed the chances are reducing.

Thirdly, I didn’t strike the ball anything like I have been doing and in those conditions any bad shot will cost you dear.

I tried to stick to the routine and go back to it after a shot but nothing seemed to work.

There is a another comp on Monday and we have a team match away at Swansea Bay on Tuesday evening for which we have a couple of regulars missing.

Regards,

John

Your ability to recover from bad holes is really impressive. The 2nd was very good because it included a 3-putt.

 

 

 

The 3rd hole was very unlucky given that you made a 4 with your provisional. So far, I am going to give you a 5 for the first, a 5 for the 2nd and a 4 for the 3rd!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To get out of that bunker on the 14th for a 6 is good.

In your e-mail you write: “… and finished nicely (sic) with a db after being just short of the 18th in 2.” What do you mean “nicely”?

 

I don’t think you played badly. You are disappointed, naturally, because you have been playing so well. But the scores of fellow morning starters tell you that you were only slightly off the pace. You actually played well after a poor start, you have tremendous fighting spirit. Your ball striking was compromised by your “plan”, under those conditions it would have taken a phenomenal application of will to take a step back, a deep breath and find a sweet, sweet swing.

I’m sorry this is so long, I just thought it was the right moment to re-emphasise some important principles.

Regards,

Colin

 

ViperProof by ViperChill